Daily Kos

View Story | 41 comments

  •  They said they would do this (4.00 / 4)

    My memory blurs, but I pretty clearly remember U.S. officials warning in articles that ran around 2001 or 2002 that the United States would be sending prisoners to Syria and Egypt to be tortured.

    I think one obvious problem here is that the United States is torturing hundreds and hundreds of prisoners pretty much at random.

    If the United States were, say, seriously mistreating 20 prisoners who had very, very obvious informational value -- example, people who appeared to be senior aides to Osama bin Laden -- some folks here might be protesting, but no one else would really care. This would fall in the "war is hell" category.

    But it looks as if the United States is torturing so many prisoners of such low apparent informational value that, if the United States survives at all, eventually, a new administration is going to come in and put the CIA and other intelligence agencies under restrictions that probably will be unrealistically strict. So, the stuff the intelligence people are doing is self-destructive even from their creepy, amoral point of view.

    •  When they said they were going to do this, (4.00 / 3)

      it was in the context of 9/11 just having occurred, and most of us presumed that the tactic would only be used against clear terrorists.

      Now we know it has been used much more widely, and even spread to the quite conventional -- not terrorist -- war in Iraq.

      So, it may always have been illegal.  But now the consequences of tolerating this tactic are much clearer.

      The influence of the [executive] has increased, is increasing, and ought to be diminished.

      by lysias on Tue Dec 28, 2004 at 07:41:24 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I agree with you (none / 1)

        I think torture falls into the "would you be willing to be executed for it" category.

        My guess is that ordinary torture doesn't work very well at uncovering reliable information. I think that hooked a person to a polygraph and an MRI machine, asking questions and studying the results would probably work a lot better.

        But, if someone thinks torture really is worth it -- i.e., the torturing will produce information that could keep a nuclear bomb from exploding in Times Square -- then s/he should be willing to turn him/herself over for criminal prosecution once the torturing is completed and the emergency has passed.

        If I used to torture to obtain information that saved a city from being nuked, I wouldn't be thrilled about being executed or imprisoned for life because of what I'd done, but I'd agree with the logic of the judges who sentenced me.

View Story | 41 comments